How Pakistan Interior Minister Helped US Embassy Import Illegal Weapons Without Telling ISI

How Pakistan Interior Minister Helped US Embassy Import Illegal Weapons Without Telling ISI

EXCLUSIVE DOCUMENTS REVEALED

On US Ambassador Anne W. Patterson's personal request, Interior Minister Rehman Malik kept Pakistan's security agencies in the dark and helped the US embassy in Islamabad create and equip private American-run militias with sophisticated weapons that are prohibited in the country outside military use. A trail of paperwork, reproduced here with this report, reveals how Mr. Malik's ministry is hand in glove with the US Embassy in secretly importing illegal weapons without following proper procedure. Another sign of the untold agenda that Washington is pursuing in Pakistan to the detriment of Pakistani interest.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—The role of the Pakistani federal Interior Ministry in the issuance of prohibited bore licenses to US defense contractor DynCorp's local partner Inter-Risk appears to be dubious. The US embassy admitted to have imported the prohibited bore weapons but other evidence shows something different.

Evidence†available with The News contradicts the US embassy’s viewpoint and shows that a resident of Daryoba Agency FR Bannu had gifted 50 weapons that were reportedly given to Inter-Risk.

Documents also show that after US Ambassador Anne Patterson’s letter to Interior Minister Rehman Malik for the issuance of prohibited bore licenses to Inter-Risk, the US embassy continued to influence the Interior Ministry that issued the required licenses to the US-blessed Pakistani security agency without consulting intelligence agencies and the Foreign Office. [continued below]

Click to enlarge

US Ambassador wrote this letter to Mr. Malik on March 30, 2009, to approve the operations of Dyncorp International in the entire territorial limits of Pakistan, without any conditions, in addition to allowing the company and its local affiliate to import banned weapons. Mr. Malik apparently approved the request without asking questions and without assessing what private US military contractors will be doing in Pakistan.

Following Patterson’s letter, US embassy officials met State Minister for Interior Tasneem Ahmed Qureshi and later formally wrote to him, setting clear deadlines for the issuance of licenses in three phases. The documentary evidence shows that the state minister acted accordingly as per the wishes of the US embassy.

Gerald M Feierstein, Charge dí Affaires ad interim US embassy in Islamabad, wrote to Tasneem Ahmed Qureshi on May 7: “I would like to thank you for meeting with my representative Michael Eicher on May 7 to discuss certain security matters that affect the US Embassy. As Mr Eicher conveyed, the United States and Pakistan share a deep commitment to improving the lives and future of the Pakistani people. However, security concerns have greatly diminished out ability to administer and expand the programmes we would like to support in partnership with the government of Pakistan.

“I order for the Embassy to mitigate the risk associated with some of these security concerns, the US Embassy has engaged with Inter-Risk (Pvt) Ltd to provide armed guards to protect our US diplomatic personnel assigned to Islamabad and Peshawar. Therefore, I would like to request the issuance of 134 prohibited bore (pb) licenses on behalf to Inter-Risk (Pvt) Ltd to accomplish this security goal.

“50 pb licenses are needed as quickly as possible and an additional 50 pb licenses will be needed in June 2009. The remaining 34 licenses will be needed in July 2009.

“I would like to thank you for your personal attention to this matter offer the renewed assurances of my highest considerations.”

Within a week time following this letter, the personal secretary (PS) to the state minister for interior writes a ìTop Priorityî directive on ministerís behalf, ordering the section officer (PB) Ministry of Interior: “The minister of state for interior has been pleased to approve fifty (50) PB arms license in favour of M/S Inter-Risk (Private) Limited.

“2. Arm Section may issue the licenses under intimation to this office by 20-5-2009.”

While the state minister issued strict direction for the issuance of 50 pb licenses to Inter-Risk by May 20, 2009, the deputy commissioner Islamabad received an official communication from office of the district coordination officer/political agent FR Bannu the same day.

The letter’s subject was “Confirmation/Verification of Weapon Gift” and it read as: “The enclosed certificates (consisting 50 no) for gift of weapon, gifted by Malik Khanzada Khan Wazir Daryoba Agency FR Banny dully verified by the undersigned for further necessary action.”

Official sources said that these apparently gifted weapons were provided to Inter-Risk, however, actually the said weapons belonged to the Americans. Why the DCO Bannu did this and on whose order could not be ascertained as despite repeated efforts and telephone calls, the officer did not talk to this correspondent. His staff said that the DCO was sitting in the office but the officer did not even bother to return the call.

Deputy Commissioner Islamabad Amir Ahmad Ali, when contacted, said that he took over as DC Islamabad in June so he did not know as to what was the secret behind the DCO Bannu’s letter. The then DC Islamabad Asadullah Faiz, when contacted, said that he did not remember the case and its details.

US embassy spokesman Richard Snelisry, when approached by this correspondent, admitted for the first time that it had imported prohibited bore weapons for Inter-Risk against the licenses given by the Interior Ministry. He said that it was part of the contract signed between the embassy and Inter-risk. When his attention was drawn to the DCO Bannu letter, he said that he did not know anything about it but insisted that everything on behalf of the US embassy was transparent and within the limits of Pakistan’s laws. He said that it was possible that the Inter-Risk had obtained the gifted weapons for something that had nothing to do with the US embassy. He said that the US embassy was not responsible for everything that the Inter-Risk has done or is doing.

The embassy spokesman Richard Snelsire, commonly known as Rick, said that he had no knowledge of any letter written by any embassy official to the Interior Ministry's state minister and giving deadlines for the issuance of licenses to Inter-Risk following the letter of Anne Patterson.

Click to enlarge

A junior US diplomat in Islamabad, Gerald Feierstein, writes a letter asking for several licenses for illegal weapons that embassies are not supposed to have. The Pakistani Minister, Tasnim Qureshi, obliges in less than five days. That's a record short time for something as serious as this.

State Minister Qureshi, when approached, confirmed that he did receive a letter from Gerald M Feierstein but denied that it was part of US embassy’s influence on him to proceed accordingly. Qureshi said that he issued the licenses without referring the matter to the Foreign Office or the security agencies, as it was a routine affair. He said Inter-Risk was a registered security agency and the US embassy wanted prohibited bore licenses to beef up security of its personnel and interests.

The state minister, however, said that he was never informed about the fact that Inter-Risk was a local partner of the American security company DynCorp. He said that he also did not know about the “fishy” affairs connected with Inter-Risk. However, the fact remains that the relationship between DynCorp and Inter-Risk was clearly mentioned by the US ambassador in her letter addressed to Interior Minister Rehman Malik and dated March 30, 2009.

In her two-page letter, Patterson shared her security concerns with Rehman Malik, particularly about the US Consulate in Peshawar. She had referred to the common objectives and shared visions between the two countries for the Frontier province and the tribal areas of Pakistan. She wrote: “Recognizing that the responsibility of your Ministry and provincial law enforcement is not limited to the Consulate but remains confronting the miscreant elements directly and everywhere, the US government has entered into a commercial contract with DynCorp International and their Pakistani subcontractors Inter-Risk (Pvt) Ltd, and Speed Flo Filter Industries to provide specialized security support for our consulate in Peshawar.

“I feel this contractual arrangement will allow your security forces to focus on their priorities and at the same time allow us the ability to continue consulate operations with an appropriate level of security support. Our security plan will incorporate both the commercial security personnel and the NWFP police contingent already dedicated to supporting the consulate.

“To accomplish the goals of our commercial contract, I am requesting your approval for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for Dyncorp International, Inter-Risk (Pvt) Ltd, and Speed Flo Filter Industries to provide security services for the US government. More urgently, we request your intervention to facilitate granting Inter-Risk (Pvt) the requisite prohibited bore arms licenses to operate in the territorial limits of Pakistan and as soon as possible.”

This report was published by The News International on Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009. Mr. Abbasi broke the story on DynCorp and Inter-Risk. His work, and that of The Nation led to the arrest of the owners of Inter-Risk and the clampdown on the suspicious activities of DynCorp in Pakistan.

International concerns grow over the safety of the Indian Nuclear Arsenal

International concerns grow over the safety of the Indian Nuclear Arsenal

October 6, 2009

The Naxalite Threat

LONDON – Far removed from the photo-shopped images of ‘Shining India’, lies a dark and sinister shadow that stalks the Indian Republic. The spectre of the Naxalite threat now has middle-class urban Indians nervous as they watch increasingly worrisome media reports of the repeated failures of Indian Security Forces in containing the ‘red menace’ in the jungles and hinterlands of India.

What was once only a peripheral threat to the Indian State has now reached a critical mass that has left even the ivory-tower Indian elites in New Delhi with furrowed brows. An embarrassing problem once ignored and neglected has now broken out into the worlds glare. And rightly so. As the vigour of the Reds grows from strength to strength, and the impotence of the Indian Army and Paramilitary is increasingly apparent, questions are being raised of the safety and security of India’s nuclear weapons arsenal. Similar concerns were raised internationally only a few months ago when the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan were said to be within spitting distance of Islamabad and Pakistan’s own nuclear arsenal was seen as an obvious target. But whereas the Pakistan Army swiftly and efficiently routed the militants from a standing start within just a few weeks, their colleagues in India have struggled to contain an irresistibly growing Naxalite movement that has pledged to bring New Delhi down.

In fact, there are few parallels that can be drawn with the Pakistani case. Whereas the Pakistani militants numbers in a few thousand and were confined to a tiny fraction in the north of the country, their Indian equivalents boast ranks of at least 20,000 strong (and growing) and have had significantly greater success. Now infesting massive swathes of Indian territory, India’s Naxalite problem is the most prolific and violent insurgency in any nuclear armed nation, and leaves Pakistan’s recent troubles far behind in terms of the implications for regional and indeed international security.

According to Indian government sources, the insurgency, which started in 1967 as a peasant uprising, has now spread to 20 of India’s 28 states – and is showing no signs of exhaustion. A staggering 700 people, including civilians and police, have been killed in the rebellion so far this year, up from 638 in total last year. Observers may be shocked that such dangerous developments have been scarce reported in the world’s media, but in September the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh – probably on a break from being feted in world capitals – let the cat out of the bag when he described Naxalism as India’s greatest security threat, and said that security forces were failing to halt it.

With the rebel movement seemingly unstoppable, the international community is becoming increasingly vocal in its concerns of the very dangerous prospect of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of fanatical extremists. A the same time, the Indian government is desperate to save face and avoid derailing its recent global public relations blitz. Thus it is planning a major assault on the rebels across the four states where their presence is strongest. The move comes as new evidence emerges the Naxalites are stepping up their military and operational deployments as their successes have won them thousands of new recruits across the country.

But commentators are sceptical about what this new campaign can possibly achieve considering all of India’s recent botched attempts to stamp out the growing menace. Ajay Sahni, executive director of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi, says Indian forces do not have the strength – in terms of “numbers, training, transportation, arms” – to gain control over such vast swaths of territory. “Until there’s been a steady, tremendous capacity-building, all deployments will be irrational,” he says. “It will just be a nibbling away at the peripheries, and a lot of security forces will be killed.”

As Indian forces are sent into the rebel-infested eastern states of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa, and Bihar, the world will watch with baited breath. It is too early to say whether international concerns over the security of the Indian state and nuclear arsenal will be alleviated, but considering past performance, the prospect does not look good. The Indian Army may buck past trends and achieve its objectives, but more likely, there will be a great deal of movement in international capitals as contingencies are drawn for the worst-case-scenario.

Men who sell their Country. Hussain Haqqani included.

Men who sell their Country. Hussain Haqqani included.


It is interesting that Hussain Haqqani was in London and was acting as a spokesperson of the PPP. In his days of "refugeeship" in USA he was nurtured by the Zionists. He only has aMA degree from Pakistan which is equivalent to a four year US Bachelor degree. He was made Professor at Boston University (we will go in this at later time). He was nurtured to deal with Zardar during his "refugeeship" in New York. So the deal was designed by the Zionists. Benazir was reluctant. She was pushed into it. When she landed in Pakistan she found the contempt Musharraf had for her. She said the deal is over. Then came the other Guru nurtured by the Zionists, known as Rehman Malik. His actions on December 27, 2007 speak for themselves.
Zionists are successful in taking control of Pakistan through their Qadiani proxy.
Musharraf is Qadiani. To marry Sehba he had to become one. Sehba's uncle was the head of Qadiani Jamat in Okara.�
Rehman Malik is Qadiani.
Naveed Ijaz is Qadiani.
Nadeem Taj is Qadiani.
Musharaaf Sethi will write editorials that it is unkind to call Musharraf Qadiani.
Why he does so? We will go into that later. For the time being keep these news items fresh in your memory.
When Najam Sethi was apprehended there was a storm in the international press. When the Chief Justice is apprehended for 150 days the press stays quiet.
The apprehension of Najam Sethi was an inside job to malign the Government. The same way was 911 an inside job. But who can discuss this with Hussain Haqqani? The Chief Justice is thorn in the butt of the Z Lobby. Remember Ramzy Yousuf and Rehman Malik. Remember Khalid Shiekh Mohammad and the $100,000 sent to USA by a Pakistani General.
Remember, recently, Hussain Haqqani and Rehman Malik burning files from NAB Office. How much did Hussain Haqqani sell his soul for? (Also see: Brandwashing , Zionists have already made a successful inroad into the decision making circles of the new government, Howling Hala, hopeful Haqqani, talking tribals! , Islamic terrorism: a sinister construct of Muslim moderates and their neo-con allies . )

The Case against Transit trade to India

Bharat wants to reach Central Asia for several reasons. It wants to encircle Pakistan and incapacitate its political clout and Delhi wants to aphyxiate Pakistan’s economic growth so that it can accomplish its goal of Akhand Bharat

Even though Bangldesh is surrounded on three sides by Bharat (thanks to the Radcliff Commission’s criminal decisions on the boundaries) the Bangldeshis (without nuclear weapons) have vociferously opposed transit facilities to Bharat (aka India). The transit issue became so contentious in on 14th August, 1975 a group of Bengali patriots assassinated Shaikh Mujib Ur Rehman and annulled the Indo-Bangladesh treaty of Friendship which would have in affect reabsorbed Dkhaka into Bharat. For the briefest moment, Khondkar Mustaque announced a confederation with Pakistan.

Sri Lanka has also paid very dearly but has stood strongly against hegemony and diktats. In the 80s, during the height of the cold war (when Delhi was in the Soviet orbit) Sri Lanka tried to form agreements with the US which were at the time not deemed in the interest of Delhi. Bharat unleashed the terror of the LTTE (complete with suicide bombers) on Lanka to teach it a lesson. Lanka after thirty years has finally come out of the terror trap laid by Bharat.

Bharti (aka Indian) intentions towards Afghanistan are more than innocent and the Afghans know it. Mr. Hamid Karzia is selling the Afghans short, first by encouraging NATO, ISAF and the US to continue to wage war on the Afghan people and secondly by selling what’s left over to to Bharat.

Propelled by the US engine, and the Bush activities, Delhi is bent upon regional domination and world hegemony. It waged incessant war in Sri Lanka for about three decades through its poxy in Sri Lanka, and tried to absorb Nepal by playing all sorts of dirty tricks in supporting the royalty and then switching sides several times. It tried to use instigate a rebellion in Tibet to bifurcate China so that the imperial powers to parse it out among themselves–Ughuristan to Russia, Manchuria to Japan, Tibet to India, the area beyond Hong Kong to Britain and the rest divided up into small cantons. Bharat tried to occupy Sri Lanka ostensibly under the guise of helping Colombo. She tried to reincorporate Bangladesh using Musjibur Rehman when an Indian general ruled Dhaka through the Rakhi Bahni. Bhrar also tried to take over tiny Maldives, and routinely intimidates Thailand and Mayanmar. Bharat supports, arms and trains the TTP just like it nurtured and developed the LTTE in Lanka. Bharat has resurrect the cold war relic called the BLA. Delhi at the behest of Israel is now actively supporting the Junduallah to cause problems for Tehran. Thus Bharat has the unique distinction of waging wars on each of her neighbors. Delhi however has not had much success in creating “Greater India” or Akhand Bharat. Most of her schemes have failed.

It is pedagogical to see what Bharati leaders have been saying for the past several decades. Lala Hardayla was one of the seminal forces in Bharat in the forties and remains an icon for the RSS and the BJP. Shuddi means reconversion back to Hinduism, and Shangtram means “Spanish Inquisition type of ethnic cleansing and deportation. In this statement, which he called his political testament (”The Pratap” of Lahore), Lala Hardayal said:—

“I declare that the future of the Hindu race, of Hindustan and of the Punjab, rests on these four pillars:

(1) Hindu Sangathan,

(2) Hindu Raj,

(3) Shuddhi of Moslems, and

(4) Conquest and Shuddhi of Afghanistan and the Frontiers.

So long as the Hindu nation does not accomplish these four things, the safely of our children and great-grandchildren will be ever in danger, and the safety of the Hindu race will be impossible. The Hindu race has but one history, and its institutions are homogeneous. But the Musalmans and Christians are far removed from the confines of Hindustan, for their religions are alien and they love Persian, Arab and European institutions. Thus, just as one removes foreign matter from the eye, Shuddhi must be made of these two religions. Afghanistan and the hilly regions of the frontier were formerly part of India, but are at present under the domination of Islam. . . .

…Just as there is Hindu religion in Nepal, so there must be Hindu institutions in Afghanistan and the frontier territory; otherwise it is useless to win Swaraj. For mountain tribes are always warlike and hungry. If they become our enemies, the age of Nadirshah and Zamanshah will begin anew. At present English officers are protecting the frontiers; but it cannot always be. . . .If Hindus want to protect themselves, they must conquer Afghanistan and the frontiers and convert all the mountain tribes.” Excerpted from Dr. Ambedkar’s book “Pakistan”.

Many Hindu nationalists have discussed Hindu ambitions to rule the people of Kabul through an imaginary land East of Bali, Indonesia called Raj Kalhani.

“Lord Curzon celebrated India’s importance in The Place of India in the Empire (1909): The central position of India, its magnificent resources, its teeming multitude of men, its great trading harbors, its reserve of military strength, supplying an army always in a high state of efficiency and capable of being hurled at a moment’s notice upon any point either of
Asia or Africa–all these are assets of precious value. On the West, India must exercise a predominant influence over the destinies of Persia and Afghanistan; on the north, it can veto any rival in Tibet; on the north-east . . . it can exert great pressure upon China, and it is one of the guardians of the autonomous existence of Siam. The New Great Game; Why the Bush administration has embraced India.Twining, Daniel

After eliminating the “Indian Mutiny”, (War of Independence) the British got serious in India. The sloppy command of the East India Company was replaced by the British Army that brought the situation in control Spring boarding from the conquest of India, he tried to establish the seeds of a global British Empire that would face the Europeans rivals, the Russians and the Chinese, the pre-eminent powers of the time. Lord Curzon presided over the “High noon of the Empire” and wanted to take it to new heights. Bharat’s first Prime Minister had a huge vision for Bharat beyond her actual borders.

[India was] “the pivot round which the defence problems of the Middle East, the Indian Ocean, and Southeast Asia revolve. Jawaharlal Nehru

“Independent India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, shared Curzon’s expansive vision, declaring India “the pivot round which the defense problems of the Middle East, the Indian Ocean, and Southeast Asia revolve.” Wary Chinese strategists perceive a continuity of strategic design from Curzon to the Congress party today, accusing Nehru at that time of harboring ambitions for a “greater Indian empire,” and more recently criticizing India’s aspirations for “global military power.”

“China and India,” writes the Carnegie Endowment’s Ashley Tellis, “appeared destined for competition almost from the moment of their creation as modern states.” The New Great Game. Daniel Twining

Curzon argued that the defense of the Empire entailed protection of the entire region between Kabul and the Amu Darya (Oxus river) to the North, Colombo to the South, the Makran coast (now in Pakistan) to the West and Mandalay in Burma to the East. Lord Curzon seemd to think that that the Britain’s future lay in capturing and holding Central Asia.

“Turkestan, Afghanistan, Transcaspia, Persia – to many these words breathe only a sense of utter remoteness or a memory of strange vicissitudes and of moribund romance. To me, I confess, they are the pieces a chessboard upon which is being played out a game for the domination of the world.

“Because the successors of the Turkish Ottomans were unwilling and unable to exercise the right to rule many of their Turkish subjects in Eastern Turkistan, Britain evaluated her own right to rule these lands. After the defeat of Britain in Kabul, later British policy abdicated the right to rule Central Asia to Russia.India is considered by many as the successor state to the British Empire in India.

Most Bharati leaders have maintained their vision of reaching the Oxus river (Amu Darya). Pakistan is seen as an impediment to their Westward’s march.

“NWFP belongs to India and Punajb is on the way”. Statement made to henry Kissinger by Indiara Gandhi. Reported by Henry Kisisnger to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in declassified documents of meetings between Kissinger and Bhutto.

Mr. Adhvani, Mr. Modi and Mr. Thakery routinely make similar statements about the “destiny of India”, which they liken to America’s manifest destiny. It has been half a decade that political scientists witnessed a watershed event in the history of the Subcontinent. India established it’s first military base outside India a few miles from the capital city Dushambe in Tajikistan. The Singh Doctrine is nothing new, it is the application of the American Monroe Doctrine to Asia. The Doctrine defines spheres of influence for powers with “security zones”. To understand the Singh Doctrine, and to confirm that history repeats itself, we need to leaf through the pages of history for lessons learned Lord Curzon has been described as British missionary with a vision.

We have written extensively about the India’s hallucinations for years. Dr. Munshi, a Bangladeshi barrister sheds light on many of these themes in his seminal book titled “The India Doctrine”. When Lord Clive arrived in Bengal, the province included Bihar, Bengal and Orissa. He made three provinces out of Nawab Shiraj Ud Daulah’s kingdom of Bengal. The next five centuries saw South Asia’s most prosperous population reduced to the hungriest and poorest. Lord Curzon around 1906 discussed possibilities for extending the British Empire beyond the Indus. He had tried to empower the Muslims of Bengal by partitioning Bengal. Lord Curzon was very unpopular among the Hindus of the British Indian Empire. However Nehru tired to use his On to the Oxus and beyond the McMahon Line doctrine to try to extend Bharat’s borders right up to Uzbekistan. Pakistan is a huge impediment to Bharat’s plans.

The recent Memorandum of understanding signed between Mr. Karzai and Mr. Zardari allows Bharat access to Afghanistan through Pakistan. The Wagah to Torkham trek is 540 miles. This access is being given to Bharat without consent of parliament and without much discussion in the CNN inspired media in Pakistan. It was hidden in the Afghan-Pakistan transit trade agreement MOU. While Mr. Zardari’s government tried to hide the “regional” scope of the Afghan-Pakistan agreement, the Mayor of Kabul Mr. Karzai spilled the beans. Pakistanis all over the world are fuming. Even the Bangladeshis are perplexed at this strange commercial deal signed by Mr. Zardari.

The highly respected Association of Former Ambassadors (AFA) has requested the speaker of the National Assembly to arrange hearings on the subject of the Memorandum of Understanding signed with Afghanistan on transit trade. Of particular concern in this connection is the opening of the land route through Pakistan (Wagah to Torkham) to trade between Afghanistan and India, as proposed by the Afghan side. AFA has pointed out that the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea grants to the land-locked states the freedom of transit to and from the sea only. Pakistan is not obliged to provide to Afghanistan access to or from a third country also. Despite this, Pakistan has over the years allowed Afghanistan the use of the Torkham-Wagah route for its exports as a gesture of friendship. The association supported the continuation of this unilateral concession to Afghanistan.

The association members said that all stakeholders including members of the AFA may be invited to participate in these deliberations so as to ensure a thorough and detailed examination of this important policy matter. AFA has voiced deep anxiety at the failure of the government to provide adequate information on the concerns raised by the public at the purpose and scope of the proposed new transit and trade agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan in Washington on May 6 during the trilateral meeting of Pakistan, Afghanistan and the United States. On Kashmir, and most other matters India is agreeable only to bilateral talks. One wonders what got into the minds of the rulers that they agreed to this massive concession to India in trilateral talks, without informing the people, and without even a request from the Indians.

At the same time, the AFA expressed concern that an announcement on the conclusion of the agreement, about which the Pakistani public was given no prior information, was made in a third country by an official of that country. Actually, it is obvious we are bonded slaves of America. The continuing reticence on the part of the government in addressing these concerns, and the attempt to stifle debate on the question in Parliament, have given rise to serious misgivings and doubts in the minds of the public. The Nation

It is very obvious that the deal is contentious on many counts. First of all it is not an agreement yet. Right now it a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which has no legal standing. Secondly, it is a huge security concern for the Pakistan Army to quietly watch Tata trucks rumbling through Pakistan and traveling on Pakistanis freeways. Indian arms have flooding the FATA and Swati region, how many more Indian arms will be tolerated by Islamabad. Third the Indian goods transported through Pakistan will be directly competing with Pakistani goods being exported to Afghanistan. Fifth, the Pakistani freeway system was not built for NATO supply lines, nor was it built for Indian trade. The purpose of the Pakistani roads is primarily to serve Pakistani businessmen not Indian businesses. Sixth it is a matter of fact that most goods exported to Afghanistan end up being smuggled back into Pakistan. Darra and Landi Kotal are bases which feed the pipeline to Sohrabgot in Karachi and all over Pakistan. If transit trade is given to Bharat, the Pakistani industry will face many challenges from cheap and shoddy Bharti goods dumped into the Pakistani market. Seventh, Pakistan gets no advantage from the transit trade, because neither Nepal nor Bangladesh offer any type of markets to Pakistan. Pakistan can cheaply export good to Bangladesh via existing sea channels that have worked well in the past. Eighth, it is strange that Bharat did not allow land routes to Pakistan from 1947-1971 and now asks for transit concessions from Pakistan without any reciprocal deal on Kashmir. Ninth, If the security establishment is to be believed in Pakistan, Bharat is sending massive amounts of arms to the BLA and insurgents in Swat and FATA. The land routes would help Bharat to do this with ease, using Pakistani roads. At the very least barter trade and currency could easily be sent to Kabul without hindrance or pretenses.

Pakistan almost has a border with Tajikistan. It has links of language, culture, religion and food with Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. A narrow trip of land a few miles wide separates Tajikistan from Pakistan. That strip of Afghan land was deliberately placed their to separate the British Empire from the Tsars of Russia. Pakistan has to negotiate with Afghanistan on that narrow strip of land near Shariarv or the Iskashim Nature reserve in Uzbekistan. Pakistan could build an Afghanistan specific berth in Gwader or Port Qasim or Karachi and declare it Afghan territory but Pakistan has to get direct access to Tajikistan. This would link up Pakistan directly to Tajiksitan. An alternate arrangement would allow Pakistan to build a bridge or a tunnel under Afghan territory to link up to Tajikistan. Afghanistan is totally landlocked and needs Pakistan. Some Pakistani territory can be exchanged with Afghanistan to link up to Tajikistan. It has no access to the outside world. The modern’s relations with the Central Asia states have seen their ups and downs. After 1990, the Central Asia came down in droves to Pakistan selling their wares.

All Paksitanphobes may not Bharatis, but all Indians are surely Anti-Pakistani. may be The unbounded glee of Bharatis around the world and in Bharat about Pakistan’s troubles in Swat or anywhere else tell us reams about who their sympathies are with. After the blast at the Marriot, the Indian Foreign Minster pretty much said “Pakistani get what they deserve”. this is is the theme in Indian newspapers and blogs around the world. In the past thirty years, this author has never found an Indian who had anything good to say about Pakistan. A google search may be unscientific, but will surely prove to the world who Pakistan’s real enemies are.

There is a concerted effort on the part of the Fifth Column in Pakistan to sell the transit trade to India. One of the Chief proponents of Delhi’s interests in Pakistan is of course Mr. Ayesha Siddqa. She has shown her true colors. Ms. Ayesha Siddqa sold Pakistan Army secrets to India (after working for the Pakistani DOD for years), stayed in Delhi for an extended period of time and got her Anti-Pakistan books published in Hindustan. In her June 5th column in Dawn wrote extensively about the trade agreement selling the point of view of Hindustani businessmen. Pakistanis have come to expect pro-Indian rhetoric from Najam Sethi of the Daily times. It comes as no surprise. After all Mr. Sethi, a darling of the West is part of the same 5th column that has never kept Pakistani interests supreme.

Pakistan for six decades has refused Bharat transit concessions ’till Kashmir is resolved. Pakistanis should vehemently impress upon the Zardari government that only parliament can make such huge decisions, and this MOU should never see the light of day.

---

Lashkar-e-Taiba & ISI Responsible For Cricket Debacle: India

September 30, 2009

Dan Qayyum | PakistanKaKhudaHafiz.com EXCLUSIVE

CENTURION – Within minutes of Pakistan’s last ball defeat at the hands of Australia at the Centurion ground in South Africa, Indian Minister for Extrenal Affairs S M Krishna has sensationally pointed the finger at Kashmir-based militant group ‘Lashkar-e-Tayba’ which it alleges is supported by Pakistan’s InterServices Intelligence Agency (ISI).

‘We know there is no way Pakistan would have lost to Australia after being in a winning position towards the end. We have intercepted calls from Lashkar-e-Tayba masterminds made to the Pakistan dressing room in those last few minutes of the game. You can see why Misbah-ul-Haq went down and asked the physio came out with the message that they have to lose the game.’ He remarked.

Earlier, Home Affairs minister P Chidambaram had talked of Lashkar-e-Tayba using earnings from betting on allegedly fixed matches to fund what he called ‘Terror attacks’ on Indian soil.

“Its the oldest and quickest way to make money to be used for Terror attacks against India”, he said. “Daud Ibrahim has done it in the past and now Lashkar-e-Tayba has bought the Pakistan team and I suspect even the Australian team. The international community must take notice of this injustice on India and punish Pakistan severely. We will take this to the United Nations Security Council and get both teams banned”

“Team India is the best team in the world at the moment and despite not winning any games in the ICC T20 and going out in this tournament, they will still be the number one team in the world. Infact we have arrested today a Pakistani ISI agent who masterminded the fixing of the matches in T20 World Cup in June this year”, added Chidambaram.

Reaction on the streets to India going out of the ICC Champions Trophy has been surprisingly muted. Fans interviewed minutes after Australia’s victory at Centurion declared they never expected India to fare well in this tournament.

“Everytime Pakistan plays we know the games are fixed by the ISI, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Daud Ibrahim and Al Qaeda. They know they cannot beat us fair and square so they have resorted to paying the officials and umpires to make it difficult for India to win. There’s no point watching cricket anymore whenever Pakistan is involved. I just want to kill myself”, said a teary-eyed 24 year old cricket fan in Delhi before jumping off the 7 ft high boundary wall around his slum and breaking his arm in the process.

India is also said to be launching a probe into the rain that washed out their game against Australia on the 28th, giving a point each to both teams which led to India having to rely on Pakistan’s result against Australia today. Alleging the involvement of Chinese weather satellites, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has promised to investigate claims from his cabinet that Beijing had assisted Pakistan’s ISI in changing the weather conditions at Centurion, causing a massive downpour that swept away India’s hopes and rested them firmly on Pakistan’s shoulders.

Meanwhile in another development, a few members of the Pakistan cricket team had to be taken to hospital after being out of breath due to laughing uncontrollably at an Indian TV Programme.

‘The boys are fine, we just happened to tune into this programme, I think it was a comedy show, on Zee News in the dressing room and man those guys are hilarious, we just couldn’t stop laughing’, said star batsman Shahid Afridi before bursting into another fit of laughter and being stretchered off to the emergency ward himself.

NEWS JUST IN:
In response to the Indian allegations, Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik called a press conference just moments ago and accepted the Indian claims as true, while promising a full investigation into ISI’s alleged link to the match result at Centurion today.

Six Jewish Companies Own 96% of American Media

The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Americans pay the price of collective stupidity.

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…” (How to Kill a Palestinian)

Facts of Jewish Media Control -Electronic News & Entertainment Media

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies. ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group. Time Warner, Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune). When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience. With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies? Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division. Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress. It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995. The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert. Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline). The Print Media After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think. The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone. Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news. The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue–not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers–that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers–primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands. The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines. Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government. The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.

Other Mass Media

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a susidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew. Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million. U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country. Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews. The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown). Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.

The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media

These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least. Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly, not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests, interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people. By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.